Are Taylor Swift and Billie Eilish really feuding?

The current epic drama between Kendrick Lamar and Drake might have made the brutal diss monitor stylish once more, however within the pop realm, oblique shade-throwing appears to be the order of the day. When the conflict includes two of the largest pop stars alive, and their mighty fandoms are those decoding their insinuations, even refined or unintentional slights can grow to be amplified to the purpose of absurdity.

But that additionally leaves the remainder of us asking what’s and isn’t actual. Are Billie Eilish and Taylor Swift actually feuding? From a sure angle, it definitely appears like Eilish has spent the previous couple of months utilizing her promotional cycle for her new album, Hit Me Laborious and Mushy, to drop informal however pointed criticism at Swift. From one other angle, it looks as if Swift might have retaliated in her personal Swiftian manner — by releasing bonus editions for her new album, Tortured Poets Division, timed to compete with Eilish’s album launch.

Whereas Swift’s fame for petty feuding is so well-known that she made a complete album about it, this battle appears completely out of character for the notably laid-back Eilish. But it appears to have been Eilish whose thinly veiled barbs in opposition to Swift first gained discover and steadily fueled the fireplace. Have we entered an period the place followers look to show the whole lot into an epic rivalry — and so they’ll discover a solution to do it, even when there’s nothing there in any respect?

Or is the Eilish/Taylor beef — with layered jibes resulting in battles waged by fandom foot troopers on social media feeds throughout the web — simply how pop stars battle today? 

On the coronary heart of this feud is the Billboard album chart. Swift’s Poets has been on the prime since its April 19 launch, and Swifties have a single-minded aim of preserving it up there so long as potential. One of many methods artists gamify the charts in a extremely aggressive digital age is by releasing variant album editions — a trick Swift is well-known for utilizing. For Poets, she launched a normal album, then instantly expanded it to a double album with 30 songs, then all of the sudden dropped three extra shock, limited-time album variants on Could 17. 

To Eilish followers, the timing of those three new album drops was sus: They landed the identical day as the discharge of Eilish’s personal new album, Hit Me. Swifties argued the timing was purely coincidental — only one extra manner of boosting Swift’s aim of preserving her album at No. 1 for so long as potential. For Eilish stans (who don’t have a collective title, oddly sufficient), that rationalization fell flat: If the timing didn’t matter, why did Taylor step on Eilish’s launch date? Particularly since they have been restricted editions, that means followers had a slim window of time to purchase them — a window of direct competitors with Eilish.

For his or her half, Swift’s followers have been side-eying Eilish’s camp: They quickly realized Eilish’s supervisor, Danny Rukasin, had favored and retweeted (and swiftly deleted) a tweet implying that Swift had an extended historical past of deliberately “blocking” different artists’ paths to the highest of the chart by strategically dropping her personal releases. The calendar is finite, so Swift’s releases are more likely to be much less about spiting different artists and extra about restricted house, and Rukasin might have been motivated much less by this specific gripe and extra by a normal dislike of Swift as an artist. Followers quickly dug up one other occasion when he shaded Swift on social media, which fed the flames of hostility between the 2 camps. 

In the meantime, each artists waged a back-and-forth with competing bonus editions of latest tracks all through the week, in an effort to cinch the highest. Finally, Swift retained the No. 1 spot, with Eilish slotting in at No. 2.

After all, all of this may simply have been chalked as much as unlucky coincidence, inevitable competitors, and heated feelings relatively than beef — nothing that basically rises to the extent of a full-blown, two-sided battle. 

However what fandom today thrives on a lack of battle? It’s straightforward to see why neither fandom has backed off the drama. You don’t must dig deep to seek out proof that the meat is likely to be actual, and that Swift might need supposed to go head-to-head with Eilish. That’s as a result of Eilish may have been sitting on some longtime animosity towards Swift — a resentment that would have began with one other artist altogether. 

To seek out the supply of this mess, we’d have to leap again to 2022. Damon Albarn, the frontman of seminal British bands Blur and Gorillaz, kicked off the yr by bizarrely bashing Taylor Swift’s songwriting potential. In a January interview with the Los Angeles Instances, Albarn first flatly claimed that Swift “doesn’t write her personal songs,” then doubled down by including that she doesn’t even co-write her personal songs. Since Taylor Swift’s major declare to fame is her songwriting potential, this was a really odd — if not outright misogynistic — hill for Albarn to randomly die on. 

However inside nearly the identical breath, he took issues in a fair weirder course, by evaluating Swift’s music to that of Billie Eilish and her brother Finneas O’Connell, with whom Eilish continuously co-writes:

I’m not hating on anyone, I’m simply saying there’s an enormous distinction between a songwriter and a songwriter who co-writes. Doesn’t imply that the result can’t be actually nice. … A very fascinating songwriter is Billie Eilish and her brother. I’m extra drawn to that than to Taylor Swift. It’s simply darker — much less endlessly upbeat. Far more minor and odd. I feel she’s distinctive.

For all we all know, the incident might have ended there — Albarn apologized to Swift after huge backlash, blaming the Instances for “clickbait”-editing no matter he really stated. 

Nevertheless, fast-forward just a few months, and Billie Eilish herself took issues a step additional. Throughout her history-making gig at Coachella, the place she was the youngest headliner in historical past, Eilish introduced out Albarn for a shock visitor efficiency. This might have been a purely fannish gesture on Eilish’s half. Nevertheless, whereas Eilish was praising Albarn and the affect he had on her personal music, an unidentified male voice on a scorching mic might be heard on the live performance livestream joking, “We’re getting sued by Taylor Swift.”

On the time, Swifties leaned towards the offender behind the voice being Eilish’s brother O’Connell. Followers appeared torn on whether or not or to not view this as deliberate shade towards Taylor on the a part of Eilish and O’Connell: In spite of everything, O’Connell had beforehand praised Swift’s songwriting as “inspiring,” and he attended her birthday celebration in 2021.

Nonetheless, it’s straightforward for issues to get twisted within the cutthroat sport of leisure, and we all know how Swift can maintain a grudge when she feels her artwork has been disrespected. And judging by a number of feedback Eilish has made within the promotional cycle for Hit Me Laborious and Mushy — feedback that definitely appear to be directed at Swift — the vendetta may go each methods.

On March 23, weeks earlier than Swift’s Poets launch, Billboard printed an interview with Eilish through which she spoke of the “wasteful” apply of artists releasing vinyl albums primarily to garner extra album gross sales and safe longevity or greater gross sales rankings on the Billboard charts. Though your complete interview was about Eilish’s broader efforts to advertise environmental sustainability, she was particularly sharp in her criticism of this (admittedly, sure, wasteful) apply:

I discover it actually irritating as someone who actually goes out of my solution to be sustainable and do one of the best that I can and attempt to contain all people in my workforce in being sustainable — after which it’s among the largest artists on the planet making f–king 40 completely different vinyl packages which have a distinct distinctive factor simply to get you to maintain shopping for extra. It’s so wasteful, and it’s irritating to me that we’re nonetheless at a degree the place you care that a lot about your numbers and also you care that a lot about being profitable — and it’s all of your favourite artists doing that sh-t.

Since, once more, this can be a tactic for which Swift is legendary, followers learn your complete sidebar as a swipe at Swift particularly. Eilish herself rapidly responded through Instagram and denied that she’d supposed to slight any particular artist. “It might be so superior if individuals would cease placing phrases into my mouth,” she reportedly wrote. “I wasn’t singling anybody out.”

If this had been a one-off assertion, it might most likely have been simpler for followers to consider Eilish. As an alternative, this was only the start of a string of moments when Eilish’s normal complaints may be learn as particular criticism of Taylor Swift. It’s price noting that every of those subsequent interviews got here after Swift’s Could 17 “block” of Eilish’s album, so it’s additionally potential that what began out as pure coincidence on Eilish’s half rapidly turned private.

In a Could 21 interview for Apple Music, Eilish drew nonetheless extra consideration for remarks that appeared to shade overtly autobiographical songwriting — , like the sort Swift is once more infamous for. 

“I actually needed the songs to not be like, ‘Oh, I do know what that’s about,’” Eilish says. 

I feel that we stay in such a world the place everybody is aware of the whole lot … Everyone seems to be conscious of the meat that occurred and conscious of the those that don’t like one another and conscious of this and that.

Folks put songs out, particularly within the pop world — and I’m not saying there’s something fallacious with it essentially, but it surely’s simply, we stay in a world of, like, someone places a tune out and everybody’s like, ‘So that is who that is about and that is your complete story of what occurred,’ and it’s like, it doesn’t even give the listener an opportunity to interpret it how they wish to interpret it and the way they naturally hear it. And that I discover actually irritating. I don’t wish to hear a tune that I’m like, ‘Ooh, my god’ — each single lyric, I’m like, ‘Oh, my god, that is about that individual.’

At this level, her brother, O’Connell, chimes in, agreeing, “No, it may be gross … I don’t take heed to ‘The Luckiest’ by Ben Folds and take into consideration his spouse. I take into consideration who I’m in love with.” 

Taken by itself, that is all fairly innocuous kvetching in regards to the inventive course of. However taken as a part of an ongoing sample of the siblings subtly shading Swift, her songwriting, and her manufacturing course of, it feels much more damning.  

Oh, after which Eilish apparently added Swift-style performances to the guidelines of issues she doesn’t like.

Final yr, Eilish referred to as each Swift and Beyoncé “untouchable superstars” within the LA Instances, referencing their epic stadium reveals, which may every run three hours or extra. “The truth that they will placed on a present that lengthy, and it’s crammed with so many unbelievable moments, is basically wonderful,” she stated. On the time she sounded admiring, not confrontational. 

Following the album launch conflict, nonetheless, her tone modified dramatically. In a Could 23 broadcast on social radio platform Stationhead, Eilish said, “I’m not doing a three-hour present. That’s actually psychotic. No person desires that. I don’t need that … I don’t even need that as a fan. My favourite artist on the planet, I’m not attempting to listen to them for 3 hours.” As soon as once more, Swifties rushed to allege that Eilish was shading Swift particularly (and Beyoncé, however the Hive appears much less pressed).

We’ve by no means identified Eilish to overtly antagonize Swift earlier than, and certainly in 2019 she thanked Swift for “taking good care of [her]” by means of her music when she was a toddler. But this wouldn’t be the primary time a youthful feminine artist discovered herself in opposition to Swift. Simply take a look at Olivia Rodrigo, who borrowed liberally from Swift as a key affect in her music. Swift embraced the younger singer, till the pair had a rumored falling-out over the problem of tune credit. That kerfuffle might or might not have led Rodrigo to burn Swift within the scathing 2022 tune “Vampire,” through which she depicts the titular fang-bearer as a considerably older determine who exploits the singer’s youth and naivete. 

Have we talked about Rodrigo and Eilish are good associates? And that Eilish has stated she feels “very protecting” of her? Certainly, in a Could 22 interview with Stephen Colbert to advertise her new album, Eilish riffed poetically in regards to the want for younger artists to have the liberty to repeat different artists whereas they’re discovering their very own fashion. “Inspiration goes to show into extra inspiration goes to show into extra inspiration,” she stated. Although Eilish was ostensibly speaking about her personal vocal improvement, some gawkers watching the unfolding beef interpreted it as Eilish commenting on the Swift-Rodrigo feud. 

It is smart; there’s some hypothesis that Swift tapped Sabrina Carpenter to open for her “Eras” tour partly as a result of Carpenter and Rodrigo have a longstanding enmity over a messy love triangle. Rodrigo likewise has been teasing an upcoming remix of “Vampire” as a collaboration with Lana Del Rey — who’s allegedly presently on the outs with Swift. Different celebrities additionally appear to be taking sides within the dispute. Sza, who by the way is without doubt one of the artists whose album Swift was beforehand accused of attempting to “block,” had beforehand denied there was ever any beef between the 2. She was not too long ago noticed “liking” an Instagram publish dinging Eilish for her excessive live performance costs and brief efficiency occasions — an obvious refined shade on behalf of Swift.

For her half, Swift has but to touch upon the continued warfare between her fandom and Eilish’s — although her PR workforce’s Twitter account did make a publish on Could 25 referencing the road “try to come for my job” from Swift’s tune “I Can Do It With a Damaged Coronary heart” — a publish that many followers interpreted as a diss in opposition to Eilish for being unable to swipe the No. 1 chart rating from Swift.

Is any of this actual or is all of it only a manufactured face-off? It’s laborious to inform. However the animosity has definitely pushed consideration and renewed power towards each artists. In the course of the feud, Swift’s album Midnights reportedly turned the quickest album by a lady in historical past to succeed in a whopping 9 billion streams on Spotify. In the meantime, Eilish’s album lead, the racy bop “Lunch,” reportedly turned her quickest single ever to succeed in 100 million Spotify streams. 

It’s no secret {that a} celeb rivalry like this one drives gross sales. However there’s one thing irritating in regards to the ephemeral nature of this one. On the one hand, there’s loads of believable deniability round every of the statements from Eilish that followers are up in arms about. On the opposite, the very fact there are so many statements throughout an lively press tour implies Eilish isn’t enjoying. She additionally hasn’t bothered to make clear that she’s not speaking about Swift. (Vox has reached out to each camps for remark.)

When hip-hop artists create diss tracks, the overall sentiment is that the gripes create good music, and the music is what issues. We’ll undoubtedly hear Swift’s aspect of this newest dispute in her subsequent album. However the vacuum of actual details about what’s occurring right here has left a spot that followers have chosen to fill with a whole lot of finger-pointing and side-taking. It’s a well-recognized routine for anybody who’s hung out round stan tradition, however the drama detracts from the accomplishments of each artists. It’s laborious to really feel served by this battle the best way, for instance, Kendrick’s beef with Drake doubled as a commentary on authenticity in hip-hop tradition. If Eilish actually does suppose Swift’s songs are too literal, her concert events too lengthy, her launch technique too wasteful, and her feuds too petty, there have to be higher methods to air these grievances. 

Maybe she ought to write a tune about it.