Letter on Countering CCP Drones Act: Public Security Issues

Letter to Senate Armed Providers Committee highlights extreme impression on public security operations

In a letter despatched to the Senate Armed Providers Committee immediately, the California Hearth Chiefs Affiliation, representing over 800 hearth companies in California, together with public security advocacy teams DRONERESPONDERS, the Legislation Enforcement Drone Affiliation (LEDA), AIrborne Public Security Affiliation, and different first responder advocacy teams voiced sturdy opposition to the inclusion of the Countering CCP Drones Act within the Senate model of the Nationwide Protection Authorization Act (NDAA) FY2025. The letter arrives forward of the Senate’s scheduled dialogue on June 12, 2024, and descriptions important considerations over the potential repercussions of the act on public security drone operations.

Key Factors of Concern

The Countering CCP Drones Act, launched by Consultant Elise Stefanik, seeks to handle nationwide safety considerations by including DJI, a serious Chinese language drone producer, to the FCC Lined Record. This motion would empower the FCC to retroactively revoke all DJI licenses while not having Congressional approval, successfully dismantling roughly 90% of all public security drone operations. The letter highlighted that this might not solely have an effect on navy personnel but additionally jeopardize the protection and livelihood of communities throughout America.

“The Countering CCP Drone Act is dangerous as a result of it overlooks the fast operational wants of public security companies, compromising first responders’ capacity to reply successfully to emergencies,” the letter states. “The over-reliance on unproven alternate options to established Chinese language drone expertise is impractical and harmful. Merely put, now we have not but reached parity with China.”

Potential Impacts on Public Security

The letter emphasizes that banning DJI drones would disrupt vital public security operations. The affiliation argues {that a} balanced strategy is critical—one which addresses safety considerations with out an outright ban on DJI drones, which haven’t demonstrated any impropriety in printed experiences and are important in saving lives and deescalating risky conditions each day.

The affiliation additionally references the Drones for First Responders (DFR) Act, one other legislative effort by Consultant Stefanik. This act proposes tariffs on Chinese language drones to fund a grant program enabling police departments to buy non-Chinese language drones and put money into American drone expertise. Nevertheless, the letter contends that the success of the DFR Act is contingent on the exclusion of the Countering CCP Drones Act from the NDAA.

Unintended Penalties and Suggestions

The letter from public security teams warns that together with DJI on the FCC Lined Record would eradicate tariff income wanted to subsidize the upper prices of American drones. In addition they spotlight the unrealistic assumption that different Chinese language drone firms, like Autel, would compensate for this loss.

The affiliation urges lawmakers to think about the broader implications of the Countering CCP Drones Act on public security. They name for a technique that balances nationwide safety considerations whereas safeguarding American lives—a stability they imagine the present model of the act fails to realize.

Conclusion

In closing, the letter underscores the necessity for cautious consideration of the Countering CCP Drones Act’s impression on public security. The affiliation expresses readiness to collaborate with lawmakers to develop a technique that addresses safety considerations with out compromising the effectiveness of public security operations.

“We’re prepared and keen to collaborate carefully with you to develop a technique that balances nationwide safety considerations whereas safeguarding American lives—a objective that the present model of the Countering CCP Drone Act fails to fulfill.”

Because the Senate Armed Providers Committee prepares to assessment the NDAA, the considerations raised by first responders spotlight the vital want for a nuanced strategy to laws impacting public security and nationwide safety.

Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, knowledgeable drone providers market, and a fascinated observer of the rising drone trade and the regulatory setting for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles centered on the industrial drone area and is a global speaker and acknowledged determine within the trade.  Miriam has a level from the College of Chicago and over 20 years of expertise in excessive tech gross sales and advertising for brand new applied sciences.
For drone trade consulting or writing, E-mail Miriam.

TWITTER:@spaldingbarker

Subscribe to DroneLife right here.